http://videa.hu/videok/sport/cp-avl-11-DiUW00aFizLAQUHK?start=14.48
I thought this was a very decent game and while the result was ultimately disappointing there were some really strong signs of encouragement in the way we played at times.
Okay, we could possibly talk about our game not being pacey enough, but it was the same for Palace too, at least in the first half and let’s not forget it was roasting hot this afternoon.
That said, we looked a bit more comfortable with a slightly slower pace and I think we were holding our own, although Palace probably shaded it chances-wise.
We didn’t have many chances in the first half, but three do come to mind.
First was Gabby’s. He did his usual good work in outpacing the defender, leaving him a one-on-one with the goalie, only for him to hit it unconvincingly and too easily for the goalie.
Sanchez was next, with some good work before a shot that went well over.
Which is all fair enough, as he’s not a supposed goalscorer. It was just nice to see him have a crack.
And then Grealish played a nice ball on to Gabby, who, slightly wide of goal, caught it with the wrong foot and just made a complete Horlicks of it again.
Those two chances should have been two goals for any decent striker on form, it’s as simple as that for me, but it wasn’t to be and we went in 0-0 at half time, with Palace probably having edged things overall.
The second half was a different matter though and Alan Pardew had obviously given his players a rocket. Two were subbed.
His team duly upped their game and it showed as our lads began to look much less comfortable with the increased pace and pressure, which resulted in the ball ending in our net at around the hour mark.
Ultimately, while the ref originally allowed it, he had a prolonged conversation with the linesman and it ended up being disallowed for offside.
A very good decision on this occasion.
It was only a brief respite for us though, as Palace were firmly in control.
I think many of us were probably calling for Sherwood to change something and he duly did, with Traore coming on and Sanchez coming off, who had looked very competent.
As I’d suggested in the preview, I had a feeling Sherwood was winding us all up when he said Traore was miles away.
Where many of us might have had a problem with that substitution (indeed it seems some were asking for Gabby to come off), in retrospect, I can see exactly why Sherwood chose that option.
Whether we like it or not, someone at the Villa loves Gabby.
And the thinking was probably that if you going to keep playing him, it doesn’t make sense to knock his confidence.
He was, after all, getting in the right positions to make the runs wasn’t he?
I don’t think I’ll convince many of you with that argument, but it’s the only one I’ve got.
His finishing is simply awful.
Anyway, within a few minutes of Sanchez coming off, we conceded.
The ball came in from a corner and Scott Dan met it strongly to head in a decent goal.
Clark’s challenge was noticeable by it’s abscence and had me fuming. But it happens.
But then, Traore had what might have been his first touch out on the right wing and went on a blistering run that took out a couple of defenders. His cross deflected off another defender and the ball was in the net for the equaliser.
What was striking was the turn of pace. Defenders just aren’t going to be able to live with it.
The kid had another similar type run that resulted in a very decent cross.
Lip-lickingly good stuff and very likely to put bums on seats, if he doesn’t get hacked (as he was a couple of times) and does his ankles or whatever.
One each then and we were looking on target for the point.
Only for Amavi, who had had a very good game up until then, to give the ball away at the back and the defence, who, for once hadn’t worried me, went to pieces, for Sako to shoot and score.
I’m not exactly sure what happened and in fairness, it was a good shot, but I just had the feeling we were poor in our positioning and decision-making.
So 1-2 and then the game looked beyond us, with not enough minutes remaining.
I didn’t expect much from this one, so I’m not overly upset.
We played some very nice football at times, which is a great change from some of the rubbish we’ve played in recent years, although the way Palace play helped us, I think.
More importantly, I find it difficult to call anyone out for having played poorly today, although Gabby is the most likely candidate.
His finishing is just rubbish and you have to wonder how long Sherwood will put up with it.
I suspect we’re still looking for another striker, put it that way.
Comments
183 responses to “Palace 2 – 1 Villa; Disappointed but not downbeat.”
Sinclair tap in but set up by Grealish again having set up Traore first half. Grealish is going to be key this season
Bring back Lambert, my arse!
We’re halfway through a game and Sherwood is obviously trying to find out about his players in a game that doesn’t matter in the scheme of things.
I’d rather this than do what Lambert did, in playing his best side and still losing to lower league clubs.
Still trying to find out about his players….. I’d have thought he’d have done his homework before he bought them. Then, at least play them in their actual positions. Not to do so, and lose is completely incompetent. In a team that will be fighting for survival again, a cup run would be ideal.
Bunn ffs, Ayew, Baker extension…ughhh. Seasons only just begun and Dims making me wish it were over…
Lambert for Villa 😉
I give in, a chimpanzees could do a better job as manager, O hang on I know fuck all about football, patience is required ? will we be the whipping boys this year. From what’s going on its guess work.
Of course patience is required Bill.
How many of us said it would take time?
Even Sherwood has said the same.
I don’t profess to understand what Sherwood is thinking, but I’m at least willing to give him more than 4 games with his own team before I make any judgement.
Well I said 6 and then I’m going up the garden to find my bow and arrows, I always said a good cup run makes pounds shilling and pence , but it can also lose you money.
Fair enough he deserves time but he ain’t doing himself any favours with the line up he has used, didn’t need to play players out of position, shooting yourself in the foot. With the amount of attacking players he started with he has showed little respect, I know it’s league 2 but it’s still 11 against 11, showing lack of experience.
Jimbo, I can’t argue with that.
As I said, I don’t know what he’s thinking.
I’m guessing he just wants to see all his attacking players and he’s doing it entirely on purpose.
I do like the way he is trying to get something from the game rather than just the same old same old under lambert but sometimes it can just put unneeded pressure on the team and himself. He will learn what his players have regarding attitude
To think about it Jumbo the regular player’s probably laughing at the out come, I see where Badgers coming from ,but its about bums on seats, plus gaining respect from other teams.to loose today would no doubt worry many fans.
Badger with all due respect, he should do that in friendly games, or A against B at the training grounds.
Yes I know its 3-3
Jimbo, that’s it, attitude mate; that’s what I’m on about.
Bill, the training ground isn’t good enough. It has to be in real games.
It isn’t about bums on seats either. It’s about finding out who’s got the balls for it.
At least this is how I think Sherwood is looking at it.
Sorry badger, not about bums on seats? Would you like to see a empty ground like the scum? Course its about winning and entertainment, that’s how clubs generate fans, gone are the days that sons followed dad in support of local teams, I’m still hanging on to radiation of bringing up grandkids to be Villa, only winning makes fans, you’ve got to believe it.
Only 21k tonight more than i thought though
I think we have the makings of a good team, but some players will take time to get up to speed. i don’t want us to lose tonights game, but let’s look at the bigger picture. Competitive game time for some players who haven’t had it yet. A chance to show the manager they are up to it. The more I think about Lescott the more sense it makes. An experienced centre half pairing will probably serve us well. Right Back is still an issue unless Crespo is the answer. A good number 10 and maybe a decent forward and we are in good shape.
I’ll still be pissed off if we lose but I’m more concerned that we get a good result against Sunderland
Amen DS, this is what I’m talking about.
Extra time lads.
Bill, I’d suggest this might be more entertaining than the crap we saw under Lambert?
It doesn’t mean we’ll win ’em all though,
I know that badger, I believe in winning, the old school, that’s me.
Of course, the ideal world is both, Bill.
“A good number 10”? What’s the obsession on here about us needing another attacking midfielder? We have Gill who can play there. Grealish can play there. Sinclair can play there. Not the best but Nzogbia can play there. Vertout can play there. We don’t need another attacking midfielder. We need a decent replacement for Benteke, a right back and a centre half.
I agree. It seems Sherwood wants to play 11 ‘number 10s’…I think he may be overcompensating for Lambert failing to bring one in!!
The obsession B6? Name the last time we had a good number 10. A player that unlocks defences with a perfectly weighted pass and contributes a decent number of goals. Could Gil or Grealish do that? Maybe, but it’s not proven at this level. I do agree about the Benteke replacement though, but why not Kozak? He is just as likely to prove a Benteke replacement as any of the AM’s in the side prove to be a great No 10. And no I don’t think he is as good as Benteke, and i don’t think we have that No 10 but I have high hopes for Grealish.
Because we don’t have one proven goalscoring midfielder either
Goal 4-3 villa
Sinclair should play over Gabby on Saturday
We need a new GK, CB and RB. Maybe another CF, but we might have enough in that department if we play the right way.
5-3 lads Bennett.
Just woke up Oohah’s? We’re winning mate.
It’s a win, I believe we made hard work of this.
A shit line-up and we still won 5-3.
Are we still complaining?
We might have scraped a win under lambert, with his scaredy cat tactics, I reckon.
Time, people, time.
Xmas at least.
Absolutely spot on Badger. Next round???
I think this proves that Sinclair knows where the goal is and is a tidy finisher. Please don’t let Gabby back in.
3 defenders, 2 midfielders, 6 up front – that’s a hell of a formation tonight. I think there was a huge element of players getting some more game time under their belt while playing a side that we should beat – I would say typical villa but under previous regimes we’d have lost that game.
On to the next round – our name goes back in the hat. Does anyone know if Ayew, Veretout or Traore had a good game?
good result tonight Bennett and Adama played good
don’t rate Sinclair first time hes done something
villa need to get rid of bunn hes no good
Gabby better had play this weekend
blues at home ha ha ha ha ha ha
Blues!!!!!!
scum at home
Are u kidding????? That’ll be a sell out!
Don’t mind us playing Gabby for that one he does well in derbies but fuck all elsewhere
That’s us out then they will play as if their lives depend on it while we whimper out as per normal. Lucky to even get through tonight
Shut up ooh aa so doom an fuckin gloom, we would have lost tonight under lambert an scored nil.Blues at home cracker will deffo find out whos up for the fight in this one .