Page 1 of 1
  1. Sir Earl Barratt
    Sir Earl Barratt July 13, 2013 at 4:42 pm . Reply

    Realistically, how much are Donny going to be contributing to his wages? If it’s next to nothing surely he may as well stay and be available for selection? Another astute bit of business from Paul Faulkner?

  2. Morgan Villa
    Morgan Villa July 13, 2013 at 7:21 pm . Reply

    If the Benteke deal goes through it wont hurt to pay him and Hutton off. Never understood the long contract, i also think his wages are nearer £80k a week. but all that said i wish him well he is a nice bloke off the field and does a huge amount with his Mrs for charity

  3. anon3
    anon3 July 13, 2013 at 7:28 pm . Reply

    There are plenty who slate MON for his deals, but this has to be the worst of the lot, imo.

    I’ve nothing against Shay, as he seems a good pro, but the deal was just stupid.

    If I was a cynic, I’d say AM earned a nice few bob from that.
    Good job I’m not a cynic then eh?

  4. DSVilla
    DSVilla July 13, 2013 at 8:58 pm . Reply

    Why is it Faulkners fault if he goes for nothing/subsidised wages but McCleish’s for the contract in the first place? I seem to remember most fans thinking Given was a good recruit.

    Just asking?

  5. DSVilla
    DSVilla July 14, 2013 at 9:55 am . Reply

    Agree SEB. It is sickening to see money wasted like this. It’s also a perfect example how far the balance of power has shifted to the players. If they want to ignore their contract and force a move they can, but you still have to pay them as normal even if they are benched/out of favour. If you want to get rid you still have to pay the difference if they are loaned or buy out their contract if transferred to a lower wage.

Post Comment