Shock, horror and whisper it quietly, but I actually thought we were a lot better today.
We didn’t constantly give the ball away and passed much more accurately, which is a major part of what I want to see.
I know we didn’t get the preferable result, but I thought we went mostly toe to toe with a West Ham team that I didn’t realise was so dirty.
Twice I saw a West Ham player litterally swinging punches and even though VAR supposedly checked things on both occasions, nothing was given. I really do wonder what these VAR officials are seeing, but it surely can’t be right.
The ref was very poor yet again too and while he let a lot go, the vast majority of it was for the Hammers.
After going one down from the almost inevitable headline Yarmolenko, Stevie G took Luiz off and I instantly thought that it was a risky move, given that most teams are capable of almost walking through our midfield at will, as it is.
In mitigation though, we were stuck between a rock and a hard place, with needing more in attack.
I thought Watkins was very good today, even though he hardly got any service. I heard Alan Smith make a comment earlier which was “if you’re not scoring much, at least get involved”. I don’t think anyone can say he doesn’t do that.
I thought Ings was a bit unlucky with his effort that saw the goalie push the ball onto the post, but at the same time I thought he might have done better. Perhaps I’m being a bit harsh there.
What about Martinez’s save? That was superb reactions and had the commentators rightly raving about it as save of the season by a mile. I probably wouldn’t go that far, but it was a cracker.
What disappointed me was the usual ease in the way opponents seem to just bypass our midfield with a couple of passes, yet we do the same so rarely. It’s something I’ve mentioned over and over this season and it just seems ridiculous that we didn’t bust the bank to sign a decent central midfielder in the winter window.
Would having done so, have pushed us up the table a couple of places? Maybe not, but I tend to think it probably would.
It’s just something we need to sort out in the summer, without a doubt.
I’m not to sure there’s too much more to say.
We were beaten by a bigger stronger side that basically bullied us out of the game through fair means and foul.
I’d expect Gerrard to definitely add to our physicality as soon as he gets chance.
A big shout to our defence who I thought were mostly very resolute today.
Comments
51 responses to “West Ham 2 -1 Villa; Not quite enough to match them, but it was better.”
Sun 🌞 out and I’ve missed it to watch this rubbish display by villa boo boo
Arteta was struggling at the start but arsenal stuck with him look at them now.
Villa sacked Smith and look at them same place if not worse off.
It’s only because worse teams below them that their not battling relegation.
All this hype about Gerrard is bullshit he’s not good enough 😡
Poor as piss ,flat as a bloody pancake
Just should of gone at them time to put the youngsters in and give them a go I think
Perspective: West Ham and CL challengers. Arsenal are nailed on for top 4. This is our third season back in the PL and there’s been a change of manager. I’ve spoken about games Gerrard is ‘allowed’ to lose. The last two fall into that category. So it’s still only 3 defeats that we shouldn’t have lost under SG: Brentford, Newcastle, and Watford. I believe we played them at the wrong time, but it’s still 3 too many. We have 8 games remaining and there are 4 we must win and 4 we could ‘legitimately’ lose, emphasising the fact that we are an inconsistent mid-table team. Alfie was right; this season is about transition and consolidation. I would take top 10. For me that would be progress, taking into account the departure of JG, all the coaches pre-season, and then the change of manager. Before saying this manager isn’t good enough, ask yourself, how many of the current squad – Smith’s squad – Suso and Lange’s signings – are good enough?
Judge SG in May 2023, if WW111 hasn’t put paid to the football calendar by then.
Not saying Gerrard isn’t good enough but I think it’s fair to say he still has to prove himself and, as you say, until he’s had a full transfer window and pre season it’s unreasonable to make that judgement.
What concerns me is not that we lost against Arsenal but the manner of the loss. That first half non performance is something we have seen far too often and under different managers.
Although the second half was marginally better it remains that the only shot on target we managed all match was the last kick of the match and a free kick at that.
I am genuinely concerned that the Coutinho effect could be as negative as it might be positive. Again I think that’s a fair point for debate.
I have seen it said that a confrontation Between Courtinho and Watkins after the game happened. It wouldn’t surprise me as both was none enterty in the game.a very poor game by us .