Villa – Norwich; No excuses for this one. It’s got to be a win

Well, it has, hasn’t it?
Quite simply, we’re facing the poorest team in the league at home.
And as far as I’m concerned, that’s all there is to it. I know this is football and anything can happen, but the fact is we won’t get an easier game all season.
Norwich still have a mathematical chance of staying up, but everybody knows that when you’re ten points adrift of safety at this stage it’s looking incredibly unlikely.
What does this mean for my newly acquired gambling habit then?
Well, I’m not twenty quid confident, but I’m more than a tenner confident, so have gone, er, in the middle.
So the Villa had definitely better win!

Mind you, I’m pretty much saying it should be straightforward, but a glance at the table shows that their current form dwarfs ours. They actually have a win and a draw in their last five games.
Which says it all about our shocking form of a solitary point.

Apparently, there’s going to be some sort of appreciation thing going on for Dean Smith and while I understand the sentiment, I don’t quite understand why we’d go that far. How will Stevie G feel about that?
What’s wrong with the good old fashioned big round of applause, similar to what we give ex-players who have been good servants?
Don’t get me wrong, I liked Dean Smith as one of our own, but this almost seems to me like some kind of admission that we were wrong to call for his head. We weren’t. He had to go because we weren’t progressing in the way we needed too.
I know we’ve gone through similar stuff under the present manager, but the circumstances are totally different. Gerrard hasn’t had anywhere near enough time, as much as things look bleak just now. He will not get much chance next season and a poor run of form then will see him sacked too.

Squad news then and there isn’t much really.
Bertrand Traore is back, but Sanson and Hause are both out. I’m past caring about the Frenchman, I think, because he’s a 100% goner. Hause too, probably, but I see that as a shame. If we do get another centreback in, I hope he can head the ball.

Josh Sargent is on the verge of a return for Norwich after being out with an ankle injury. Lukas Rupp is also back from a knee problem and Kenny McLean has a broken toe, but might play via an injection.
Defender Christoph Zimmermann is out with a hip flexor problem.
I can’t say I’ve heard of any of them, to be honest.

So given that this is the easiest game we have left this season, surely we can expect to see some of the kids can’t we?
Certainly looking at the rest of our games, they’re a lot tougher and any of them would be a baptism of fire for a young inexperienced player to start.

I’m going to guess that if we’re in a good position, the likes of Tim Iroegbunam might get minutes, but I don’t think Gerrard will have the courage to start him.

So we can expect the usual players that have performed so poorly over the last few weeks.
The manager has asked for plenty of agression, but that’s a smokescreen to me. Agression and effort isn’t the problem for me. There’s so much of that on display that we look like headless chickens, running around like idiots and not actually concentrating on anything that involves quality, like passing the ball accurately.
To be honest, it’s this sort of claptrap that actually turns me off this manager, but in his defence, what else is he supposed to say?
I’ve still got it in mind that even a very good player like John McGinn looks like a total clown lately.
That’s worrying.

So what to think?
Well, I’ve gone for the final result to Villa in my bet and it’s just a matter of the score.
I’m going for 2-1, but I’m not really convinced. I just can’t bring myself to say that Norwich will beat us, but I could possibly see a draw, which would be interesting because I think Villa fans’ patience is already wearing thin.

UTV!


Comments

140 responses to “Villa – Norwich; No excuses for this one. It’s got to be a win”

  1. William Pearson avatar
    William Pearson

    If that was Sterling he wouldn’t have passed it back..

  2. OLL again avatar
    OLL again

    As thoughts turn back to the 1982 stars 40 years on, one feature of that team was their durability – which in turn meant there were fewer needed in the squad.

    Villa today have recruited players who spend months out. Is this bad luck. No in most cases. Break a major bone and the permanent scars are mental, example Ray Graydon, because the bone itself knits back together stronger than before.

    On the other hand, breaking minor bones in the foot will happen again to players who are susceptible. Muscular injuries: typically groin and hamstrings and joint injuries: hip, knee, ankle tend to recur. Before any player is bought his medical history should be researched for periods on the injury list. It is a fallacy to assume the player was unlucky and that after joining Villa he is no more likely to suffer a similar injury than a player who has not had that injury. Wrong. Our history proves that. Do we expect to get a full season out of Digne, Bailey or Traoré? The stats say no, they were absent from their former clubs for several matches.

    If a player is for sale, and appears to be a better player than the selling club’s first choice, that should ring alarm bells.

    1. Big Fat Ron avatar
      Big Fat Ron

      Targett can do a full season. Oh dear.

  3. Badger123 avatar
    Badger123

    We seem to have made some shocking signings, injury-wise, without a doubt.

    And it seems we over-train the players, with Targett looking like a classic example.

    Which given the amount of experts the club has, is inexcusable.

    We’ve now just added another one,which is interesting. Why would you leave Liverpool after 17 years to come to the Villa?
    Gravy train springs to mind and it can only be for vastly improved wages.
    Just as the ST prices have been massively increased.

    https://theathletic.com/news/aston-villa-boss-steven-gerrard-hires-phil-roscoe-from-liverpool/ZbaVfZiiW9xO/

    1. Hitchens60 avatar
      Hitchens60

      I don’t have a problem with the basic increase of 10% (not 30% as some have claimed) in ticket prices as there hasn’t been any over the ‘Covid years’ and Villa’s prices are some of the lowest in the EPL.

      Where the problem arises is in the reduction in concession rates and the seat re-zoning which left a significant (minority) of fans facing up to a 300% increase in their prices – particularly students, younger fans and for the over 66 year olds.

      The fan consultation group raised this with the club who, having looked at it, have introduced a 50% cap on any individual price increase which at least means they are listening.

      Amazing how many coaches, medics, advisors and ‘shrinks’ clubs need these days!

    2. Roscoe?
      Why would he?
      (Unless £££’s are significantly better)